小田原市だけじゃない。生活保護窓口で「体売って働け」「中絶強要」など実態をNPOが報告

世田谷区では、DV被害者に「親に連絡を」との例も。
|

生活保護窓口で、職員が「体売って働け」。妊娠を告げた女性に「どこで堕ろすんですか?」...。

小田原市では職員が「保護なめんな」などと書かれたお揃いのジャンパーを着用していたことが判明し、担当者が謝罪した

一方、生活困窮者からの相談を受け付けているNPO法人POSSEの渡辺寛人さんらは1月20日、都内で記者会見を開き、こうした事例は他にも数え切れないぐらい行われていると指摘した。

POSSEに相談があった事例では、北海道の50代の車椅子の女性は、働けない病状にも関わらず就労しろと迫られ「体売って働け」とも言われた。

また、千葉県内の生活保護窓口で出産扶助を受給しようと妊娠を告げた女性は、窓口のケースワーカーに「どこで堕ろすんですか?」と尋ねられ、中絶を強要させるようなパワハラを受けたという。

また、神奈川県内では通院やアルバイトのために自動車を保有している男性に対して、ケースワーカーが手放すように強要し「お前なんかこの市に住むべきではない」と暴言を吐いたという。

■DV被害者に「親に連絡を」

POSSEによると、東京都世田谷区の生活保護申請窓口では、申請しようとしたDV被害者の女性に対して、加害者の親に連絡を促すなどの不適切な対応があったという。同日、世田谷区の保坂展人区長に面会して対応の改善を申し入れ、保坂区長は「早急に事実を確認する」とのコメントを発表した。

POSSEが不適切な対応があったと指摘しているのは、以下のような申請者の話だ。

生活保護を申請しようとしたのは、東北地方出身の20代女性。

女性は、親兄弟から受けていたDV被害により精神障害を患っっている。家族から逃れるため、2016年9月から都内で知り合いの家に居候していた。
その後、一人暮らしをしようと、生活保護を受けるために2016年10月に世田谷区の烏山福祉事務所の窓口を訪問したが、窓口で応対した職員には、DV被害について話しているにもかかわらず、「一度家族に連絡を」などと言われ、精神的苦痛を受けた。
また、生活保護の申請もすることができなかった。

その後、女性はPOSSEに相談、職員が申請窓口に同行したとこと申請が受理され、現在、女性は生活保護を受けることができているという。

生活保護法では、扶養義務者が生活保護に優先されると定められている。しかし、虐待・DVを受けている人に対する二次被害を防ぐため、「DV防止法」やそれに基づく通達では「被害者の居住情報保護に配慮するように」と定められている。

また、生活保護法では、受給の申請は誰でもすることができるとされている。にもかかわらず、申請を受けてから審査をするのではなく、窓口段階で職員が住民からの申請を阻む「水際作戦」は、違法行為となる可能性がある。

渡辺さんは、「この事件でも職員には『生活保護の窓口に来るような人には何を言っても構わない』という差別意識があったのではないか。同じような事案はまだまだたくさんあり、一つ一つ調べて今後報告していきたい」と話している。

一方、申し入れを受けた世田谷区の保坂区長は「早急に事実を確認するための調査を担当所管に指示いたしました。事実確認の結果、改善が必要な点は早急に対応し相談者に寄り添う対応となるよう適切に対処してまいります」とするコメントを発表した。世田谷区側は、1月27日までに事実確認をして公表するとしている。

■反バッシングムーブメント設立

小田原市職員が「なめんなジャンパー」で威圧的な対応をしていたことが問題になったが、ネット上でも頻繁にバッシングが行われている。

しかし実際には、生活保護の不正受給の割合(2015年度)は、金額ベースでは0.4%。日弁連は、生活保護を本当に必要としている人のうち受けられているのは約2割だとし、こちらの方がより問題だと指摘している

渡辺さんらは「『自己責任論』に基づき激しくなっているバッシングに対して、客観的な事実やデータを元に対抗する」として、行政の不適切な対応などを公開していく「反バッシンングムーブメント」を設立したと発表。現在、団体に相談が寄せられた中から不適切な事例約50件をサイト上で公表している。

関連記事

貧富の差が激しい国トップ10
10. ギリシャ(01 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.335\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 24.0% (12th highest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.220 (3rd largest)\n> Poverty rate: 15.2% (7th highest)\n\nThe health of a labor market is a factor affecting income inequality. Residents of countries with high unemployment rates may be less likely to earn a decent living. Greece, which went through a financial crisis in 2009, certainly fits the bill as a country where good-paying jobs are hard to come by. The country’s annual unemployment rate as of last year was more than 26%, the worst of any country in the OECD. The country’s part-time workers were much more likely to be unemployed because they had no other options. Moreover, 46.6% of the country’s part-time workers would have preferred a full-time job but could not find one. This was much higher than the 15% across the OECD.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:Kristoffer Trolle/Flickr)
9. 日本(02 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.336\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: N/A\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.153 (11th smallest)\n> Poverty rate: 16.0% (6th highest)\n\nIn every country in the OECD, income inequality was mitigated somewhat by the country’s taxes and transfers, which include welfare and other forms of social assistance. In Japan, the country’s Gini index score fell from 0.488 before taxes and transfers to 0.336 after the fact. A college education often ensures a higher income, and so it might make sense that a well-educated population would be less likely to have high income disparity. Japan is at least one case where this is not the case, as nearly half of the country’s 25-64 year olds had the equivalent of a college degree, the third-highest proportion in the OECD.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:MD111/Flickr)
8. ポルトガル(03 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.341\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 25.2% (10th highest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.196 (11th largest)\n> Poverty rate: 11.9% (12th highest)\n\nSpending on social programs such as welfare, housing, and unemployment insurance can have an impact on income inequality, but in the case of Portugal this is clearly not sufficient. Just over 25% of the country’s GDP was spent on social programs compared to an OECD average of 21.6%. The country is one of a handful of European nations that have been mired in economic struggles for years, even receiving a bailout in 2011 from the European Union and the IMF. Portugal had the third-highest unemployment rate in the OECD, with 13.8% of the workforce looking for work and unable to find it. Not surprisingly, the country also had one of the highest rates of residents working part time because they felt they had no other alternative.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:Chrismatos ♥90% OFF, sorry/Flickr)
7. スペイン(04 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.344\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 26.8% (8th highest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.176 (15th largest)\n> Poverty rate: 15.1% (8th highest)\n\nArguably even more than Portugal, Spain has dealt with severe financial and economic struggles as a result of the global financial crisis. Spain’s ongoing economic depression has coincided with an abysmal job market. The country’s unemployment rate was just shy of 25%. Further, nearly 10% of those who were able to find jobs in Spain have been forced to take part-time work because they could not find other employment. It is the highest rate in the OECD and nearly four times the average rate. While the employment issues may have had an impact on Spain’s income inequality, low educational attainment rates among its adult population may also be a factor. More than 44% of Spain’s 25-64 year olds had not achieved more than a high school degree.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:David Ramos via Getty Images)
6. イギリス(05 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.344\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 21.7% (16th lowest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.181 (12th largest)\n> Poverty rate: 9.5% (13th lowest)\n\nBefore taxes and transfers, the United Kingdom had a Gini index score of 0.525, which was fifth in the OECD. After taxes and transders, the score fell to 0.344, which was sixth among the countries considered. Like many of the nations with high income inequality, the UK has a relatively large economy with a GDP of $2.5 trillion as of 2014, the fifth highest in the OECD. However, the country’s GDP per capita of $39,510 was 17th highest. The country was also among the nations with the highest proportion of workers in part-time jobs because they were unable to find full-time work.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:David Boyle in DC/Flickr)
5. イスラエル(06 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.377\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 15.5% (4th lowest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.103 (5th smallest)\n> Poverty rate: 20.9% (2nd highest)\n\nEven in countries with more conservative structures, taxes and transfers usually mitigate income inequality somewhat. In Israel, the Gini score fell from 0.481 to 0.377. However, they did not have nearly as much of an equaling effect as in other countries. In fact, the country ranked 16th-least equal before taxes and transfers and fifth-least equal after taxes and transfers. Income inequality means poverty rates are certain to be higher, and that appears to be true in Israel as well. More than 20% of the country’s population lived below the poverty line, the second worst rate in the OECD. Higher educational achievement may help reduce the country’s income inequality. Just 15% of the country’s 25-64 year olds had failed to achieve at least the equivalent of a high school diploma, compared to an average 23.46% across the OECD.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:israeltourism/Flickr)
4. アメリカ(07 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.389\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 19.2% (10th lowest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.118 (6th smallest)\n> Poverty rate: 17.4% (5th highest)\n\nThe United States once again ranks as one of the least equal developed nation in the world. It is also very unusual as a less equal nation. The United States is one of the wealthiest countries in the world with a GDP per capita of close to $55,000, fourth highest in the OECD. In fact, of the 16 nations with the highest per capita income in the OECD, the United States is the only one among the worst nations for income inequality. The United states had the fourth largest proportion of adults with a college degree. Having more college graduates might have helped reduce inequality in the country.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:Anthony Quintano/Flickr)
3. トルコ(08 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.412\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 12.5% (3rd lowest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.062 (3rd smallest\n)> Poverty rate: 19.2% (3rd highest)\n\nTurkey is one of poorest countries in the OECD with a GDP per capita of $18,993, second lowest among nations considered. It also had the third highest poverty rate in the OECD with 19.2% of its residents living below the poverty line. Turkey is another nation in which taxation and redistribution system does not reduce income inequality nearly as much as in most OECD nations. The country’s income inequality was 18th worst in the OECD before taxes and transfers and third worst after.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:eleephotography/Flickr)
2. メキシコ(09 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.482\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: N/A\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: N/A\n> Poverty rate: 21.4% (the highest)\n\nLess wealth per capita does not guarantee higher income inequality, but most of the OECD nations with the worst income inequality had less robust economies. This includes Mexico, which had a GDP per capita of just $17,880, the lowest among the nations considered and less than a third of the U.S. figure. Lower unemployment might be expected to maintain more equal salaries, but that does not appear to have made a big difference in Mexico. The country had an extremely low unemployment rate of just 4.8%, fourth lowest in the OECD. Given the high rate of income inequality in the country, it is not surprising that Mexico had the highest poverty rate of any OECD country at 21.4% of its population.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:Pavel Sigarteu/Flickr)
1. チリ(10 of10)
Open Image Modal
> Gini index – post tax & transfer: 0.503\n> Social spending, pct. of GDP: 10% (the lowest)\n> Chg. in Gini after tax & transfer: 0.029 (the smallest)\n> Poverty rate: 17.8% (4th highest)\n\nChile is the only nation in the OECD with a Gini index score after taxes and transfers higher than 0.5. This is so severe it actually surpasses the OECD average Gini score before taxes and transfers. While it is no guarantee, spending on social assistance programs can have an impact on inequality. In Chile, that was not a factor, as the country spent just 10% of its annual GDP on social programs, lower than any other developed nation and less than half the OECD average. Chile also had a poverty rate of 17.8%, fourth worst in the OECD.\n\nRead more at 24/7 Wall St. (credit:Uncommon Fritillary/Flickr)